To the Editor:
As a graduate student in education at Monmouth University in
West Long Branch, New Jersey, I am currently taking a course in
qualitative research. The Bush-style education for teachers being
instituted at South Methodist University is a dangerous affront
to the future of education in this country that has serious
implications for a democratic and free society. The exclusive
emphasis on quantitative research built into the No Child Left
Behind Act is an ideological assault on the equally important
qualitative research practices integral to other forms of
scientific inquiry that can shed light on critical
consequences of education policy.
This narrow view of “scientifically-based research” as
defined in NCLB, threatens educational opportunities for
students because it does not take the whole child or the
critical significance of a broad-based curriculum into
consideration. The very real effects of educational
techniques and practices cannot be discerned simply by
analyzing numbers, statistics and test scores. Secretary of
Education Margaret Spelling’s call for an overhaul of teacher
preparation and accountability should be viewed with great
trepidation byanyone who cares about the psychological,
emotional and intellectual well-beingof our nation’s
children.
Judy Rabin
"A child's learning is the function more of the characteristics of his classmates than those of the teacher." James Coleman, 1972
Thursday, November 03, 2005
A Response to the Times
Judy Rabin posts this letter to the Times on the "new science of education" espoused by SMU's new school for test score improvement:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment