In his piece this week, Mathews goes once more to the well on the charters-are-cheaper argument, the line followed by bean counters interested only in making school systems more "efficient." Heck, man, if we can get the same test scores and save 20 percent in teacher salaries in the meantime, doesn't that make charters better? It's truly amazing how the AYP issue moves to the background for Jay Mathews when saving 20 cents on every tax dollar that goes to poor kids comes to the foreground.
Mathews' new insight on the value of charters springs from a piece of unpublished research by Scott Imberman. The research report was made available on the Web on September 28, and Jay Mathews reports on it on October 2. Now that is some hot research, even if it has not been published in a journal, peer reviewed or otherwise.
Anyway, the big finding? Charter schools have fewer discipline problems than public schools, so then that is what makes them better. What Dr. Imberman does not report in his paper is that most charter schools do not allow discipline problems, since any violation of the rules will get you booted out. Running on the playground or walking outside the white lines (hmm) are code violations in many of these "schools."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e593/6e5936d33e08d99097f2c2411a0911fa32a719fa" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment