Despite well-funded astroturf groups, the support of the Chamber of Commerce and the State Business Roundtable, and the unceasing positive spin by local corporate media, Eli Broad's Jim McIntyre's budget plan in Knoxville is in trouble.
Today teachers will be held after school to hear new scare tactics and threats about what will happen if McIntyre does not get his $35 million for a merit pay [sic] plan that has a proven record of failure.
Sent to me by a Knoxville teacher, this is McIntyre's recent letter to teachers, his "colleagues." Bolds are those of the teacher who sent this, whose name must remain anonymous for fear of losing his/her job:
Today teachers will be held after school to hear new scare tactics and threats about what will happen if McIntyre does not get his $35 million for a merit pay [sic] plan that has a proven record of failure.
Sent to me by a Knoxville teacher, this is McIntyre's recent letter to teachers, his "colleagues." Bolds are those of the teacher who sent this, whose name must remain anonymous for fear of losing his/her job:
Dear Colleagues,
Recently,
the Knox County Board of Education overwhelmingly approved an ambitious
FY13 Budget for the Knox County Schools. This bold fiscal plan includes
a $35 million structural increase to our budget over natural revenue
growth which will allow us to invest in specific educational initiatives
that we know from research and experience will lead to greater student
achievement and success.
RESEARCH? McIntyre has
NEVER produced a single shred of scientific, peer-reviewed “research” to
support his agenda, yet he keeps saying “research”. What does he
ACTUALLY mean? He has a Ph.D. He SHOULD know what “research”
is.
The School Board’s budget will soon be
considered by the Knox County Commission for funding, and as we move
into this important dialogue, I want to make sure that all our educators
have the facts about this budget. In particular, I want you to know
that this budget was developed with support for teachers as a
significant priority.
No, it was not. And to say
so at a time when this budget proposal is facing such a large amount of
pushback simply reflects an attempt on McIntyre’s part to “re-brand”
this money grab in an attempt to belatedly achieve teacher buy-in. Now
watch what he does in this NEXT paragraph:
This
budget preserves more than 100 teaching positions that were in danger of
being eliminated as funding for the Education Jobs Bill ended. The FY13
Budget also includes both step increases and an approximately 2% pay
raise for all teachers , which was funded with both
state and local funds, including about $2 million in local revenue.
Suddenly,
the specter of “teacher layoffs” gets inserted into the message from
Central Office? Nothing motivates quite like fear for one’s economic
security, right? As for “Step Raises”, McIntyre and this budget have
NOTHING to do with those. They are CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED. You may
recall, however, that that did not stop McIntyre from disingenuously
attempting to unilaterally freeze them a couple of budget cycles ago.
The same goes for the “raise” from dollars that were appropriated by the
state legislature specifically FOR teacher compensation. This “raise”
was not McIntyre’s doing, and for him to attempt to tie it to his budget
proposal in an attempt to goad support from his underpaid teaching
staff is the HEIGHT of gall. Furthermore, McIntyre has REFUSED to raise
teacher pay AT ALL in the 4 years he has been here, and has NOT “locally
matched” the state increase, as Sherry from KCEA can verify.
The
structural increase to the budget would allow us to invest in several
important educational initiatives that are delineated in our strategic
plan, including: technology, more instructional time, supports for
teachers, strategic compensation for educators, interventions and
enrichment for students, magnet and community schools, and full-day
kindergarten. In addition, this budget would allow us to make
significant upgrades to our school facilities - thereby improving our
learning environments for children - without incurring additional debt.
I
DO support “increased instructional time”, as long as it is NOT used
for additional standardized testing. I support full-day kindergarten as
well. As for “Strategic Compensation”, we all know what a canard THAT
is. Interventions and Enrichments: Like what? Will they be research
based, or will they
(as I suspect) just be ued as a reason to send even MORE local money to
Pearson Education for MORE scripted, teach-to-the-test “curricula”?
Technology: We don’t need any more “machines that go ‘bing’”” until the
technology we DO have is actually implemented EFFECTIVELY and WITH
adequate infrastructure and support. Presently, the “infrastructure”
appears to consist of school library closets and a “Keystone Cops” crew
of “repair-persons” who place them in said closets.
Clearly
this is a budget designed to significantly enhance student learning and
success, but it is also designed to better support and compensate our
teachers. In fact, over the next five years, the School Board’s budget
includes more than $60 million in additional compensation for teachers.
From APEX performance-based compensation, to lead teacher stipends, to
extended pay for an extended school year, this budget will not only
advance
the academic achievement of our students, but it will also help us to
make progress in improving our competitive position by increasing our
overall compensation for teachers.
Bullshit. Oh,
but McIntyre proposes to actually PAY US for the days we work when the
school year is extended. What a friend of labor he is! Wait – APEX
proves he is NOT.
I would invite you review the details of the School Board’s budget on our website at (link...) and to attend upcoming budget meetings (also listed on our website) if you want to learn more.
If
you review this budget and feel, as I do, that it will make a
significant positive impact on student achievement and success, please
communicate that to others in our community who place a great deal of
credibility in your perspective as an
educator. In particular, Knox County Commissioners are actively seeking
input as they consider funding for the School Board’s budget. Your
insights may be helpful in their decision-making process.
McIntyre
HIMSELF does NOT “place a great deal of credibility in my perspective
as an educator”, as evidenced by the unilateral, fear-based, top-down,
arrogant, and punitive manner is which he has managed those working
beneath him since his arrival here. As teachers were told to appear “In
Alignment” with his policies before he even ANNOUNCED his policies, it
is clear that “educator input” is ONLY valued when it “aligns” with HIS
preconceived agendas.*
As always, I am
honored to be your Superintendent and your colleague, and I am
incredibly proud of the instructional work that you have done with our
children this year. Let’s invest more in our students, our staff, and
our schools… so that
we can achieve our ambitious goal of Excellence for All Children.
McIntyre
refers to us as “colleagues” and is “honored” to be our superintendent?
His past actions would seem to indicate that he views us as little more
than “human capital” associated with various budgetary line-items, the
cost of which must be reduced under the guise of various “strategic”
schemes. PLEASE.
Sincerely,
Jim McIntyre
No comments:
Post a Comment