Online Testing, and How Pearson Sent Wyoming Back to Paper
WaPo has a story on Delaware's decision to go to online testing, so that now testing can happen all year round. Tests four times a year rather than one, tests to get ready for tests, and tests to prepare for the practice tests:
The online format allows states to give
standardized tests — once a week-long ordeal in the second half of the
school year — as often as four times a year. It’s an opportunity that
early adopters such as Delaware have already embraced.
“This is so
thrilling and exciting for those of us who work with schools,” said Joe
Willhoft, executive director of the Smarter Balanced Assessment
Consortium, one of two groups developing the new tests. “Not only will
we have the end-of-the-year test, but we will also have tests that
teachers can use throughout the year that can help students.”
Townsend
Elementary, which is located in the Appoquinimink School District,
gives students additional computer-based tests each year that teachers
say are more fine-tuned than the state exams. “It used to be testing
week,” said Charles Sheppard, the principal at Townsend. “Now we just
test.”
And then there is this from the Hechinger Report on how Pearson screwed up so badly in Wyoming that the online experiment ended after the first debacle:
By
Jill Barshay
Technical problems erupted as soon as Wyoming switched to online
testing in 2010. Students were unable to submit their tests after
spending hours taking them. At times the questions wouldn’t load on the
screen. And ultimately the scores were deemed unreliable.
“We had so many poor kids who had to take the test again,” said
Gordon Knopp, technology director of Laramie County School District No.
1, the largest school district in Wyoming.
Online testing was such a debacle that voters threw the state
superintendent of education out of office and the state sued Pearson,
the company hired to administer the test. (The state reached a $5
million settlement with Pearson, but the outgoing governor decided not
to sign it and obligate his successor to the deal.) The state went back
to old-fashioned paper, which it still uses.
Wyoming decided to be a trailblazer because the state already had a
solid Internet infrastructure. Some schools were streaming videos and
had shifted their phone systems online. Trial runs at practice test
sites went smoothly. Jim McBride, the former superintendent, said he was
hopeful that online tests would soon deliver timely results that could
be used to improve classroom instruction.
Instead, the network infrastructure collapsed under the weight of
more than 80,000 public school students. Knopp explained that there were
two cyber traffic jams. The first was that every school was routed
through a single pipe to the Wyoming Department of Education. The
Department of Education and Pearson had decided to control the raw test
data through a single, private network.
The second jam was unique to Wyoming. The sparsely populated, rural
state had set up its public Internet system to connect to the outside
world through servers in Fort Collins, Colo. The Internet pathway from
the Department of Education to Colorado was used by the entire state of
Wyoming.
“We were at the mercy of everyone else,” said Knopp.
Wyoming teachers also complained that school schedules were upended
to rotate everyone through a computer lab, which could no longer be used
for actual instruction. Some cash-poor schools had outdated equipment
that didn’t work.
Knopp predicts problems for every state and district across the
nation. “If it’s not the network, then it’s something else,” he said.
Kansas, for example, doesn’t have the resources to manage its school
computers remotely. To prevent students from, say, searching for the
answer on Google during a test, all the computers would need to be
manually “locked out” one by one and used exclusively for testing.
Knopp says that to overcome online bottlenecks, education bureaucrats
will have to operate a decentralized computer network like those of
Google, Amazon and Netflix. “They don’t make you go to a single testing
center,” said Kopp.
Online companies reroute customers to servers where
there is less traffic.
Going to online testing may sound like a great idea, but I think that school districts will have more problems with this process than they realize. Not only would there be problems that you addressed in your blog, but under ADA, the sites must be 100% accessible to students who are blind and visually impaired. This process must be explored to ensure this population of students are able to access the screen via screenreaders and screen magnification.
ReplyDelete