by Susan Ohanian
I don't look at Edutopia very often because nearly every glance provokes great annoyance.
Now, not surprisingly, Brain-based Learning, that catch-all
wonder-phrase, seemingly a direct descendant of ads for Charlie Bigelow's snake
oil, Kickapoo Indian Sagwa: the Great Indian Medicine (WILL CURE Constipation,
Liver Complaint, Dyspepsia, Indigestion, Loss of Appetite, Scrolnia,
Rheumatism, Chills and Fever, Or any Disease Arriving from an Impure Blood or
Deranged Liver*), gets its own category at Edutopia. (“Student
Responses to Common Core Instruction and Assessment.” “11
Tips on Teaching Common Core Critical Vocabulary,” “How
to Have a Healthy, Brainy, and Fun Summer,” “Education,
the Brain, and Common Core State Standards,” and so on.
What busy, hassled, and probably desperate teacher can
resist this lure: a new
learning that will give students powerful boost to their growing neural
networks of executive functions. Executive functions! I came to Judy Willis’ Student
Responses to Common Core Instruction and Assessment through ASCD’s daily SmartBrief [sic] which, since
receiving their filthy lucre from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, rarely
present more than daily neon light
evangelism for the Common Core.
July 2013
to support implementation of the Common Core State Standards
Amount: $244,733
to support implementation of the Common Core State Standards
Amount: $244,733
February 2011
to provide
teachers and school leaders with supports to implement
the Common Core State
Standards at the district, school, and classroom levels
$3,024,695
$3,024,695
At Edutopia, Judy Willis, MD, starts out her piece on brain-baased learning with a
bang:
“I am an advocate of
the goals embodied in the CCSS -- building strong neural networks of executive
functions. These networks of neuron-to-neuron connections have been an
essential element of the neurological examination of patients for over 75
years. The functions of these unique neural networks were initially revealed
through neurological case histories of patients with prefrontal cortex
degeneration, lesions or trauma. They consequently lost their
"highest" thinking skills of goal-directed behavior, judgment,
emotional self-awareness, deduction, reasoning, abstraction or subsequent
skillsets.”
Well, I'm not ready to declares Wowser! But it sure sounds good: strong neural networks of executive
functions. Teachers are supposed to be training all students for higher job functions, right? However, the studies I found
using this term have to do with autism, attention deficit
disorder, mild traumatic
brain injury. . . which gives one pause.
Remember the researchers who brought us Reading First? Almost all of them had a background in special ed. They provided the fodder for the US Department of Education edicts that all students should be taught using special ed methodology. Think DIBELS.
Writing at Edutopia, Judy Willis, MD, declares, “The CCSS goals support cognitive actions that
are the executive functions for a global economy. We cannot let this
educational goal be subverted through the challenges posed by the tests
themselves or how they are used. One of our goals is understanding how we might
best support students during the transition from passive memorization to
actively constructing understanding and applying knowledge.” She does not provide even one classroom example of these miraculous CCSS goals.
The reader must take on faith her declaration that these are “requisite 21st century
skillsets.” Acknowleding that the new
Common Core curriculum and tests cause student stress and even illness, Willis
says teachers must help students deal with stress, not fight the Common Core which is a marvel to be embraced. In other words, when the Common Core makes a whole third grade class burst into tears, the teacher must buy more tissue, not refuse to give such a test again.
Dr. Willis is also the author of
Inspiring Middle School Minds: Gifted, Creative, and Challenging, declared a “must
read” by the president of the National
Association for Gifted Children, in which ‘executive function’ is discussed 46
times. Truth to tell, she explains it
much better in this book than she does when pushing the Common Core. As it happens, I’ve also written about the
challenges of teaching middle schoolers: Caught in the Middle: Nonstandard Kids and a Killing Curriculum. The
term “executive function” does not appear in the book's 195 pages, but Deborah Meier wrote the foreword and
Gerald Bracey gave a rousing back cover blurb.
a cranky twitter , and this spot at Schools Matter.
Teachers must choose: accommodation or resistance, snake oil or children.
*Wayne Bethard. Lotions,
Potions, and Deadly Elixirs: Frontier Medicine in the American West. p 115
What infuriates me is that the Common Core proponents have hijacked the term, "executive functions", in order to subvert what legitimate research actually says about it. The preponderance of legitimate research on the executive functions capacity of student, actually, can and should be used to convincingly argue against the use of the developmentally inappropriate Common Core Learning Standards. Executive functions capacities are highly determined by fixed genetic, neurodevelopmental factors. If Piaget were alive today, his theory of stages of cognitive development would benefit from incorporating the notion of executive functions as the key mechanism to explain what tasks children can be reasonably expected to accomplish, given a particular stage of development.
ReplyDelete