A clip from the Salon article:
. . . . Few would dispute that we should hold our educators
and the children they are entrusted with to a high bar of excellence, but
evaluating performance on test scores has never been a viable strategy. As
Common Core test results have started trickling in, the results aren’t pretty.
In New York, they show a widening
of the achievement gap between black and white students. This
leaves young teachers at a disadvantage since they are often placed in high
poverty schools and are still learning on the job. They often have to also play
the role of counselor, psychiatrist, and day care provider. So while the White
Suburban Mom is disappointed because she’s tried her best to ensure the highest
quality of life for her daughter, the Single Black Urban Mom who works two jobs
simply can’t be as engaged with her son’s education: a child afflicted with toxic
stress who then takes the same exam on an empty stomach.
Ignoring these elements and relying solely on improving testing scores demeans
the teaching profession and puts the students who need the most attention and
wraparound services at a disadvantage.
Of course, this forms the ideological basis of corporate reform: firing “bad”
teachers will fix education which will lead to middle class prosperity which
will alleviate poverty. “College and career readiness” are the choice buzzwords
found in the text of the Common Core. Speaking
to Politico, Duncan said, “the path to the middle class runs right
through the classroom.” Such a perspective, keen in the 1960s, sounds
positively outmoded in 2013. As Millennials are quickly
realizing, that rose-tinted vision of education as the great social
equalizer simply cannot reconcile the effects of the Great Recession and
decades of bad policy. . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment