The Gates business plan for Memphis schools requires public school closures and corporate charter start-ups to replace them. A dozen schools are on the hit list for the coming year, and the charter operators are lined up waiting for the buildings to become empty. Parents, however, are not nearly as uninformed as county officials who are doing the Gates dirty work believe. See video below:
How the Charterization Cycle Works
How the Charterization Cycle Works
So here is how the charter school takeover cycle works. First, we need public schools isolated by
years of neglect, segregation, and poverty--schools that everyone outside the affected
communities would rather forget about. Memphis has an ample supply of these schools in the poorest
neighborhoods.
These neighborhood schools make easy targets for profiteers and ideologues convinced (or pretending to believe) that
these public schools have not met accountability expectations over the decades because
of lazy teachers, public bureaucracy, unconcerned parents, unions, or other reasons
having nothing do with poverty, race, or a sordid history of inequality.
Since 2002,NCLB’s impossible demand for schools to reach 100 percent
proficiency by 2014 brought the accountability issue to a crisis state,
beginning with the poorest schools where students’ scores were the lowest.
Parents who could afford to, over the past decade, moved or sent
their children to schools not in the dreaded “Needs Improvement” zones, thus
leaving the poorest schools with smaller and academically weaker student populations and,
thus, with even less capacity to make the yearly progress on test scores that
was required by NCLB.
Further deprived, then, of resources both human and
monetary, these schools are eventually labeled “underperforming” and “under-utilized,”
thus clearing the way for school closure attempts.
Standing in the way are parents, students, and teachers. It will take bodies to block this juggernaut.
Waiting in the wings are the corporate charter operators and
management companies, ready to open total compliance corporate charter schools staffed
with temporary missionaries from Teach for America, or one of the other organizations that emulate the TFA practice of placing white privileged young
women with no experience or training in schools that need the most
professional and mature teachers.
With empty buildings from the shuttered public schools sitting idle, the
charter operators step up to claim them by offering a token payment to the County. (Note KIPP's early bargaining position int the video above.)
Because these corporate charters are schools of choice, students who
are not performing as expected or who resist the penal model of schooling are expected
to choose another school. Otherwise, they would bring down the charter test scores, thus tarnishing brands like KIPP.
These rejected or ejected students
end up back in the remaining public schools in surrounding areas, which further concentrates the low
test performers in the surviving schools.
Further weakening of the surviving schools comes from absorbing further austerity measures
from the County to pay the $7,518 for every public school student lost to a
charter school. If another 2,000
students are lost to new charters next year in Memphis, that amounts to
$15,036,000 leaving the public schools and going to corporate
welfare charter schools getting fat on taxpayer dollars. Meanwhile, the County’s $24,000,000 schools
deficit is used to justify more cuts and further weakening of the public school’s
capacity to meet testing expectations.
(See this earlier post that provides links to the Report that predicted a $212 donut hole in Shelby County's school budget from charter expansion.)
With a State and federal continuing commitment to close the bottom five
percent of tested schools each year, it is easy to see that there will be a continuing supply of bottom five percent-ers until all public schools labeled for corporate
reform takeover have been “turned around.”
At that point, we may suspect that other money generating
shortcomings will have been identified for those schools, so that the lucrative
business of education reform can continue without pause in perpetuity, with the
public stuck paying the bill for an unending string of corporate non-solutions
to the problems that we refuse to acknowledge (poverty, segregation, corporate
control of schools).
For those who want to believe that charter schools are
providing a superior “product,” I invite you to look just below to a post from June 2013 when the latest national charter school study was released:
JUNE 26, 2013 BY JIM HORN
The corporate charter industry is
working every angle to put the best makeup on
the CREDO charter study of 2013.
And “news coverage” in Tennessee shows their efforts paying off.
Two examples of Tennessee media
“coverage” of the 2013 CREDO charter school study are provided below, and
as you can see, they are both lifted from the Tennessee
Charter Schools Association blog post. Who said blogs are not
respected sources of information!?
The blog post, of course, is the
typical self-serving propaganda we have come to expect from the charter school
promotion groups, especially the bare-knuckled privateers that the Tennessee Tea Party has put charge of containing and culturally sterilizing the children of
the urban poor in Tennessee.
I have provided links to all three
“stories,” but I have only included the first sentences in order to give you
the essence of how lazy and irresponsible reporting come to mislead the public
on how their money is spent for corporate benefit:
The source, from the Tennessee
Charter Schools Association (TCSA):
“Tennessee is among eleven states in which charter school performance has outpaced traditional public school growth in both mathematics and reading, according to a newly published study by the independent Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University.”
The “news” story from the Tennessean:
“Tennessee’s charter schools have outpaced traditional public school growth in reading and mathematics in 2013, according to a study from the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University.”
The “news” story from UT’s public radio, WUOT:
“A new study finds Tennessee’s charter schools are outpacing public schools in reading and mathematics this year.”
Now if you are an average citizen
reading either of these “information sources,” you may conclude that Tennessee
charters are outperforming public schools on the state tests. Which, of
course, is the intent of the TCSA propaganda. What the reporters for the
Tennessean or WUOT did not do, is to do what CREDO had done by indicating howthe charter and public comparisons were made by matching students
demographically within their communities:
Using the VCR [virtual control
record] approach, a “virtual twin” was constructed for each charter student by
drawing on the available records of traditional public school (TPS) students
with identical traits and identical or very similar prior test scores who were
enrolled in TPS that the charter students would have likely attended if they
were not in their charter school.
Factors included in the matching
criteria were:
• Grade level
• Gender9
• Race/Ethnicity
• Free or Reduced-Price Lunch
Eligibility
• English Language Learner Status
• Special Education Status
• Prior test score on state
achievement tests (p. 8)
In other words, Tennessee’s economically
disadvantaged charter school student test scores are compared to what we could
expect in the poorest public schools that have been malignantly neglected for
decades.
When Tennessee’s 27 [now 41] charter schools’ growth scores are compared
with the state average, the comparisons show that the majority of Tennessee
charters are testing below the state average (which, by the way, is
significantly below the national NAEP average).
No comments:
Post a Comment