With Seligman disciple, Angela Duckworth, teaming up with KIPP co-father, Dave Levin, the industrial child psychologists have an able researcher and an experimental site to figure out how to roughen up the grindstone to reduce more urban children to piles of grit.
At this point, we don't know what the how much grit will be ground out by subjecting children to years of screaming, labeling, threatening, social isolation, impossible demands, humiliation, and constant surveillance, but the corporate charter reform schoolers are hellbent to find out.
A clip from Vicki Zakrzewski at HuffPo:
. . . .Grit involves two psychological
resources: self-discipline and self-control, both of which require the ability
to manage emotions and thoughts. Yet the research on grit rarely, if ever,
mentions the importance of emotions -- and this is where the dark side of grit
comes in.
According to a U.S. Department
of Education report on grit, "Persevering in the face of
challenges or setbacks to accomplish goals that are extrinsically motivated,
unimportant to the student, or in some way inappropriate for the student may
potentially induce stress, anxiety, and distraction, and have detrimental
impacts on students' long-term retention, conceptual learning, and
psychological well-being."
In other words, encouraging or
forcing students to be "gritty" may, in some situations, do more harm
than good.
Leading emotion researcher Richard Davidson tells us that emotions
and cognition work together in a very seamless way to help us persevere on
tasks. And yet when the going gets tough and emotions like fear or anger arise,
many of us lack the emotional intelligence to know how to deal with those emotions.
Research states* that there are two
ways we regulate our difficult emotions: cognitive reappraisal or suppression.
Cognitive reappraisal means that we
reframe the situation that caused the negative emotion. For example, a student
who does poorly on a test may reframe the situation as an opportunity to learn
from mistakes and improve. People who use this method generally have more
positive emotions, closer relationships, and overall well-being.
Emotion suppression means just
that: pushing away rather than dealing with difficult thoughts and emotions.
Long term, this method of emotion regulation can lead to higher levels of
negative emotions, anxiety, and depression. People who regularly suppress their
emotions also have fewer close relationships and social support. And, pertinent
to education, researchers have found that emotional suppression is higher amongst
adolescents than adults.
This forces us to ask the question:
Are students who demonstrate high levels of grit --particularly when pressured
by parents and teachers -- dealing with their emotions in a positive or
negative way? And what about students with a history of complex trauma,
who may use emotional suppression as a method of survival? What happens when
schools grade them on their ability to push through their personal challenges
to succeed academically without giving them the resources for how to do that?
The research on grit does not provide any answers yet, especially considering
that the majority of studies have only been conducted with high-performing
students at elite schools.
It is up to parents and teachers to
help students find healthy ways to manage their emotions, so that this
potential dark side of grit does not rear its ugly head. . . .
From a child's perspective, depression, anger or frustration from failure often takes the form of behaviors atypical of an adult's response to these emotions. Children with and without disabilities will chronically avoid difficult tasks. These avoidance behaviors often appear when children begin acting out in class, fighting & aggression towards adults and peers, and/or school phobias. As children experience more & more pressure to perform, such behaviors escalate and can result in unnecessary medication trials, excessive punishment by schools &/or parents, suspensions, and expulsions.
ReplyDeleteDilettantes are making critical education recommendations without considering the consequences of their dumb dogma. Who will hold them accountable after we've lost a generation of children?