On Tuesday Hillary’s first small sit down in Iowa, which was
choreographed for the CSPAN audience, took up the subject of education. Almost 50 minutes in, one of the particiants,
Diane, receives her prompt from Hillary to ask the Common Core question at 49:48. Check out Hill’s response, which runs until
54:00.
Her comments underscore the possibility that Hillary knows almost nothing
about tests or testing policy. In fact,
in the part of Hillary’s response that begins at 50:01, she expresses her belief that the Iowa
Test of Basic Skills, which has been given since 1935 in many states as a rough
basis of comparison across districts and states, is, in fact, a state test
based on something Hillary calls the “Iowa core.” This kind of ignorance would be embarrassing
for mom in Des Moines supermarket, but for the leading presidential contender
with pre-approved questions, this is shocking.
I think part of the reason that
Iowa may be more understanding of this [the need for Common Core] is that you
have had the Iowa core for years. You
had a system, plus the Iowa assessment test, I think I am right in saying I
took those when I was in elementary school, right? You know, the Iowa test.
Iowa has had a testing system based
on a core curriculum for a really long time, and you see the value of it, and
you understand why that helps you organize your whole education system. And a lot of states, unfortunately, haven’t
had that and so don’t understand the value of, you know, a core, in the sense,
a common core that the, of course, you can then, figure out the best way in
your community to try to reach—but your question is really a larger one: how do
we end up at a point, where we are so, ah, negative about the most non-family
enterprise in the raising of the next generation—how our kids are educated. And there are a lot of explanations for that,
I suppose, but whatever they are, we need to try to get back into a, ah, broad
conversation where people will actually listen to each other again and try to
come up with solutions to problems . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment